What Do Dress Codes Say About Girls' Bodies? – Ms.Magazine
You re not going out dressed like that!
What mother would let her child wear such a short skirt?
Think about it: How often do we police girls bodies? Recent talk of school dress codes reveals that it happens an awful lot, and for some confused reasons.
After a New Jersey middle school banned1 strapless dresses from a school dance, more schools2 have been making headlines with various clothing bans and restrictions. Some of these bans focus on attire for dances3 while others target daily wear4 such as yoga pants and low-cut tops.
All, however, focus only on girls clothing, and most5 of these6 restrictions7 are put in place to avoid distracting other students (i.e. the boys).
The concern for overly exposed young bodies may be well-intentioned. With society fetishizing girls8 at younger and younger ages, girls are instructed to self-objectify9 and see themselves as sexual objects, something to be looked at.
A laundry list of problems can come from obsessing10 over one s appearance: eating disorders11, depression12, low self-worth13. Who wouldn t want to spare her daughter from these struggles?
But these dress codes fall short of being legitimately helpful. What we fail to consider when enforcing restrictions on skirt-length and the tightness of pants is the girls themselves not just their clothes, but their thoughts, emotions, budding sexuality and self-image.
Instead, these restrictions are executed with distracted boys in mind, casting girls as inherent sexual threats needing to be tamed.
Dress restrictions in schools contribute to the very problem they aim to solve: the objectification of young girls. When you tell a girl what to wear (or force her14 to cover up with an oversized T-shirt), you control her body. When you control a girl s body even if it is ostensibly for her own good you take away her agency.
You tell her that her body is not her own.
When you deem a girl s dress inappropriate, you re also telling her, Because your body may distract boys, your body is inappropriate. Cover it up. You recontextualize her body; she now exists through the male gaze.
Says15 Soraya Chemaly in The Huffington Post,
What is a girl supposed to think in the morning when she wakes up and tries to decide what to wear to school?
They aren t idiots. The logical conclusion of the distracting issue is, Will I turn someone on if I wear this? Now who is doing the sexualizing?
My daughters would never have thought these things without the help of their school.
Suddenly, offensive hypersexuality isn t just something a girl sees in music videos or magazines: It s embodied in her, and her dress-coded school reminds her of that every day.
So what about those distracted young boys? Where do they come in? By barring particular outfits from school, dress codes help boys identify and objectify16 inappropriate girls and women.
Girls who violate dress codes are violating rules, and girls who violate rules are bad. Bad girls can be17 desirable and sexy18, but they don t necessarily deserve respect19 (even from other girls20).
And where respect is absent, objectification is easy. In her guide to self-objectification21, Caroline Heldman explains how sexually objectified women are dehumanized and viewed as less competent and worthy of empathy by both men and women. Those who are dehumanized may be mistreated22 and made to feel inadequate23.
And if poor self-image is linked with objectification, it isn t hard to see that this cycle feeds itself: Those who are objectified by others are treated as less than human, and in understanding themselves as less than human may self-objectify.
Asking girls to cover up is a Band-Aid solution to far more socially ingrained problems such as general misogyny and rape culture. As long as a girl or woman is always sexualized, it won t matter how much she covers up she ll still be faulted for24 her inappropriate behavior.
It s unfair to expect a young girl to understand the full implications of her body implications put in place by an all-too-often misogynistic society and punish her for not knowing better. A girl needs empowerment, not more complications in her relationship with her body.
Jada Pinkett Smith had the right idea when asked why25 she would let her daughter Willow shave her head:
This is a world where women, girls are constantly reminded that they don t belong to themselves; that their bodies are not their own, nor their power, or self determination.
I made a promise to endow my little girl with the power to always know that her body, spirit, and her mind are her domain.
Willow cut her hair because her beauty, her value, her worth is not measured by the length of her hair even little girls have the right to own themselves.
Photograph credited to Lindsay Kamikawa via SanClemente Patch26
References
- ^ banned (www.nbcnewyork.com)
- ^ more schools (www.care2.com)
- ^ attire for dances (www.newsnet5.com)
- ^ daily wear (www.startribune.com)
- ^ most (www.startribune.com)
- ^ these (jezebel.com)
- ^ restrictions (www.actionnewsjax.com)
- ^ fetishizing girls (www.tlc.com)
- ^ self-objectify (carolineheldman.wordpress.com)
- ^ obsessing (www.sciencedirect.com)
- ^ eating disorders (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
- ^ depression (www.springerlink.com)
- ^ low self-worth (link.springer.com)
- ^ force her (www.theatlantic.com)
- ^ Says (www.huffingtonpost.com)
- ^ identify and objectify (www.facebook.com)
- ^ Bad girls can be (www.spencersonline.com)
- ^ desirable and sexy (www.spencersonline.com)
- ^ hey don t necessarily deserve respect (dicipres.wordpress.com)
- ^ even from other girls (www.youtube.com)
- ^ guide to self-objectification (carolineheldman.wordpress.com)
- ^ mistreated (www.huffingtonpost.com)
- ^ feel inadequate (www.nydailynews.com)
- ^ faulted for (www.howaboutwe.com)
- ^ when asked why (www.refinery29.com)
- ^ SanClemente Patch (sanclemente.patch.com)
Woman suing Salvation Army; claims sex abuse
A woman is suing The Salvation Army, claiming the organization moved a minister from Oahu to Maui after she reported he sexually abused her in the 1950s . Nancy Spencer’s lawsuit filed on Maui this week claims she was 11 when Maj . Richard Taba molested her .
She says her mother told The Salvation Army what happened and believed he had been terminated . But Spencer read in Taba’s obituary last year that he continued to serve as the Salvation Army’s chaplain on Maui for 40 years . A spokeswoman for The Salvation Army in California said Thursday the organization will try its best to investigate the allegations .
The lawsuit is possible because of a 2012 state law that suspends the statute of limitations for sex abuse cases until April 2014.
Shakesville: The Army's Sexual Assault Problem, Here It Is
(Content note: military sexual trauma, rape culture, hostility to consent]
After nearly two years of requests from Stars and Stripes, the U.S . Army finally released the 28-page report of a task force convened to address the problems of sexual assault at Army installations in South Korea.
If you have the spoons, you may want to read the whole thing1, as it very thoroughly goes over the rape culture problem of the Army, many of which are familiar territory (i.e., survivors are afraid to speak out for fear of being disciplined themselves; there are insufficient numbers of female unit victim advocates, etc.)
The report particularly singles out problems in the leadership . It notes, for example, that sexual assault prevention isn’t taken seriously, but “perceived as a mandated check-the-block requirement to be quickly completed rather than training to a level of working knowledge.” In light of that, it is depressing but unsurprising that the task force’s findings also included the following (bold emphasis mine):
There is a lack of knowledge among leadership about how to handle reported sexual assaults .
The report implied that leaders, along with their subordinates, might not even be able to distinguish between consensual sex and sexual assault .
Questions remain about what constitutes consent, the draft said.
“Might not even be able to distinguish.” “Questions remain.” Sure.
And is the Army getting right on task with addressing the report’s findings ?
Well, not so much:
According to military officials at the time, the task force was initially scheduled to present its findings to the Eighth Army commander within a matter of months.
However, nearly two years later, Eighth Army officials say that the report has yet to be finalized and approved by leadership, even though some of the task force s recommendations, such as the installation of closed-circuit cameras in barracks, were enacted more than a year ago.
I have plumbed the depths of my vocabulary of profanities, and still I find no words for how contemptible this is.
References
- ^ read the whole thing (www.stripes.com)

!