Anti-War Prez Obama Orders Military Support to … – Victory Girls Blog
Using Syrian President s Bashar al-Assad s reported use of chemical weapons1 (the missing WMD from Iraq?) on his own citizens as a catalyst, a red line Obama said months ago that Syria must not cross or else ! Mr . Obama has finally made a decision .
Months after his ultimatum, the or else has arrived, much to the elation of War Drum Pounder John McCain: In an about face, the most unqualified president perhaps in American history, one who touted himself anti-war as Candidate Obama, is involving us in yet ANOTHER war:
The president has made a decision2 about providing more support to the opposition that will involve providing direct support to the Supreme Military Council . That includes military support, Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communication Ben Rhodes told reporters.
And our military support will be (already is?) siding with the Syrian Rebels, reportedly heavily linked to Al Qaeda3, our mortal enemy in the War on Terror . Now correct me if I m wrong, but isn t aiding and abetting your enemy, one you are currently at war with, treason ?
Ah, but wait . Mr . Obama recently declared the War on Terror over (even though his NSA continues to spy on you and me and every other American citizen .
You know . For our Safety) . How convenient when one wishes to arm their former enemy in an effort to further the Rise of Radical Islam Arab Spring.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort .
No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Now call me a conspiracy theorist, but I find the timing of Mr . Obama s new-found muscle-flexing interesting . Could it be that he wishes to distract us from the plethora of scandals hanging around the neck of his regime like a stinking, rotting carcass ?
Would he be so callous as to send more of our troops into harm s way in order to deflect our attention, or perhaps as a political move to make himself appear presidential as his poll numbers tank ? I would hope that the answer is no, but given that everything he does seems to have a political motivation, well, I m not holding my breath.
And I find it unconscionable that Mr . Obama is willing to expose our troops to injury and death in a civil war we really have no business entering (we cannot aid every warring country), when he refused to send aid to our four Americans under terrorist attack in Benghazi (reportedly a gun-running operation into Syria4 to covertly arm the rebels), leaving them to seven hours of unthinkable hell .
Mr . Obama has shown no leadership skills . He has no credibility given all the scandals he and his administration are currently embroiled in .
And now he s put himself in charge of yet another inessential war . Pardon me if I don t feel an ounce of confidence in his ability to command our forces, or for that matter, even care about their safety or their needs . The last war we entered morphed into one that still languishes twelve years later, with military casualties in Afghanistan increasing5 under Obama s watch .
Americans are war weary .
The majority do not wish to send troops into Syria .
But what do our voices matter?
Tagged as: al qaeda, barack obama, chemical weapons, John McCain, scandals, Syria, Syrian Rebels6789101112
References
- ^ reported use of chemical weapons (www.nydailynews.com)
- ^ The president has made a decision (www.cbsnews.com)
- ^ heavily linked to Al Qaeda (www.usatoday.com)
- ^ reportedly a gun-running operation into Syria (townhall.com)
- ^ military casualties in Afghanistan increasing (www.breitbart.com)
- ^ al qaeda (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ barack obama (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ chemical weapons (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ John McCain (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ scandals (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ Syria (victorygirlsblog.com)
- ^ Syrian Rebels (victorygirlsblog.com)
Army suspends general linked to sex-assault probe
WASHINGTON A two-star general who commands U.S . Army forces in Japan has been suspended from his duties for allegedly failing to report or properly investigate an allegation of sexual assault, the Army said Friday.
Maj . Gen .
Michael T . Harrison was suspended by the Army chief of staff, Gen . Ray Odierno, and Army Secretary John McHugh, the Army said .
It provided no details about the alleged sexual assault case.
Until the investigation of Harrison’s role is completed, Maj . Gen . James C .
Boozer will take his place in Japan, the Army said.
Harrison already had been selected to become deputy commander of the Army component of U.S . Central Command, based in Kuwait . That new assignment was publicly announced in February by the Pentagon, which said at the same time that Boozer would replace Harrison as commander in Japan .
It was not clear Friday why the changes had not yet taken place.
An Army spokesman in Washington, George B . Wright, said that by suspending Harrison rather than relieving him of his command in Japan, the Army was leaving open the possibility that he might be reinstated in that job once the investigation is completed.
Harrison, a 33-year Army veteran, began his assignment in Japan in October 2010.
Amid increased political pressure to crack down on sexual abuse in the military services, the Air Force said Friday it is expanding the office responsible for sexual assault prevention and placed a female two-star general in charge.
Maj . Gen .
Margaret H . Woodward, who ran the U.S . portion of the allied air campaign over Libya in 2011 and is one of the Air Force’s brightest stars, is running the reorganized office .
She will report to the vice chief of the Air Force.
The move won praise from the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep . Howard P. “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., who called Woodward a “breath of fresh air.”
The office previously was run by a lieutenant colonel, Jeffrey Krusinski, who was arrested in May and charged with sexual battery . That incident escalated public debate over whether the military was taking seriously the problem of sexual abuse.
The House is scheduled to vote next week on a defense policy bill that would take away the power of military commanders to overturn convictions in rape and assault cases .
The legislation also would require that anyone in uniform found guilty of a sex-related crime receive a punishment that includes, at a minimum, a dismissal from military service or a dishonorable discharge.
McKeon said Woodward is well-suited to the challenge she is facing.
“I welcome her voice to this fight,” he said.
The Pentagon estimated in a recent report that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year, up from an estimated 19,000 assaults in 2011, based on an anonymous survey of military personnel.
An Air Force spokesman, Lt . Col . John Dorrian, said Friday that Woodward’s office will be given additional resources, including a much larger staff than in its previous configuration .
He said Woodward began the job this week.
Woodward entered the Air Force in 1983 with an aerospace engineering degree from Arizona State University . She has one master’s degree in aviation science and another in national security strategy.
A command pilot with more than 3,800 flight hours, she flew aerial refueling aircraft and commanded air operations in numerous U.S . military operations, including the Iraq and Afghanistan wars .
As commander of 17th Air Force, based in Germany, she commanded the U.S .
portion of the allied air campaign over Libya in 2011.
Most recently she served as the Air Force’s chief of safety .
She also oversaw an investigation of the sexual abuse scandal at the Air Force’s training headquarters at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas.
US Army sex assaults like Afghan raids
Vice Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral James Winnefeld (file photo). A US admiral says sexual assaults committed by American soldiers in the country s Army are similar to insider attacks carried out by Afghan troopers against US-led soldiers in war-torn Afghanistan.
Any form of unwanted sexual contact or sexual harassment is a different kind of insider attack that is lethal, said Admiral James Winnefeld, vice chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, during a meeting with a women’s military group on Thursday.
We will not allow this to go on We have worked hard on this but not hard enough, he added.
Washington is facing a crisis resulting from the rising number of sexual assaults in the country s military.
On May 25, President Barack Obama said the problem would undermine trust in US military.
Those who commit sexual assault are not only committing a crime, they threaten the trust and discipline that makes our military strong, Obama said during the US Naval Academy graduation ceremony at the Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium in Annapolis, Maryland.
A newly-released report by the Pentagon on sexual assaults in the military indicates that unwanted sexual contact protests involving military personnel jumped to 26,000 in 2012 from 19,000 a year before . The figure shows a 37-percent increase.
The sharp increase in the number of sexual assault cases comes as the Pentagon is planning to integrate women into front-line combat roles.
According to a survey conducted in 2011, about one out of five military women said they had been the victims of sexual assault by another service member since joining the military.
MAM/KA
How Many Girls Did You Rape When You Were Young And Horny …
I am sure by now you have seen Senator Saxby Chambliss jaw dropping mixture of misinformation and misogyny at the Senate Armed Services hearing on Sexual Assaults in the Military this week . Terrific govertainment! If you missed it, I will post it at the bottom of this article . In the middle of a six minute pep talk on how the military needs to do more to change the culture, Senator Chambliss observes that with any group of men 17-23, the raging hormones of youth make the conditions right for sexual assault .
If you are anything like me, you were yelling at the TV, How many girls did you rape when you were young and at the mercy of your raging hormones, Senator Chambliss? 1
Red State tried to rehabilitate2 the beleaguered Senator today. Eric Erickson3 wants you to know Senator Chambliss didn t mean rape when he said hormones make conditions right, he meant things like sexting and creating Facebook pages that objectify women . It s like Chambliss handed them the shovel and asked them to dig him in deeper . If the senator meant sexting and rating female cadets, as Red State suggests, what was he doing talking about those trivial matters at a hearing on sexual assault?
Weak as Red State s explanation may seem, the very fact that they would think to make such an argument highlights a problem that went unaddressed in the hearing .
The Army, and apparently Senator Chambliss, lumps rape and sexual assault into a category with all below the waist improprieties, most of them not even illegal in the civilian world . Someone needs to tell the Army and according to Red State, Senator Chambliss, that sexual assault is not like adultery . Sexual assault is not like a consensual affair with someone in your command .
Sexual assault is not like sexting . It is not a crime caused by the libido run amok, and the Army should stop thinking of it that way.
At the same time the generals were facing off with the Senate Armed Services Committee, there were two trials going on at Fort Bragg in North Carolina . In one, married, 50-year-old Brigadier General Jeffrey Sinclair is accused of adultery, which is a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice .
The 32-year-old underling with whom he was having the affair says she is still in love with him and does not want him prosecuted . Sinclair offered to plead guilty and retire, but the army refused to accept his plea . And a good thing too .
We re only in the pre-trial hearing phase and I know he called her Panda and she called him Mr . Sexy Pants . I know he liked to pull her hair during sex, and that she peed in a trash can in the corner of his quarters so she wouldn t be seen coming and going .
It s been first rate govertainment.45
The other trial6 has no govertainment value at all . It s a horror story . Staff Sergeant Robert Bales armored up, took his weapons into a nearby Afghanistan village in the dead of night and massacred 16 people, including an entire 11 member family .
He then piled the bodies together and lit them on fire before returning to base and surrendering . Truly the stuff of nightmares.
I mention these two diverse trials to highlight the change in thinking that needs to occur . The military thinks sexual assault belongs in a category of crimes like the ones General Sexy Pants is facing .
That only serves to trivialize sexual assault, the same way Red State claims Senator Chambliss did . Sexual assault belongs in the category of crimes Robert Bales is facing . Rape is an assault .
Rape is not sex act.
No matter how you interpret Senator Chambliss remark about hormones run wild being responsible for sexual assault; whether he meant he thinks being horny causes young men to become rapists, or that he thinks sexting is an aspect of sexual assault, the conclusion is the same . He is clueless . The Army is clueless .
And Red State is most definitely clueless . How can things change under men such as these?
Fortunately our bodies can just shut that whole thing down
Author s Note: One has to wonder how Saxby Chambliss was ever appointed to the Armed Services Committee, as he never wore the uniform . Bad knee .
Five deferments . Moreover, the Senator won his seat by what Washington Post columnist Mary McGrory called dirt-bomb politics7, swift boating a genuine war hero . You may remember Chambliss was the man who charged his opponent, incumbent Senator Max Cleland, with being unpatriotic .
Yes, that Max Cleland8, the patriot who not only served in the war Saxby dodged, he left two legs and an arm in Vietman . During the campaign, Chambliss excoriated Cleland for breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution, because he didn t like the way Cleland voted on an amendment to a chemical weapons treaty that said citizens from terrorist countries could serve on the UN inspection team . Don t get me started.
Senator Chambliss remarks:
Images from Senator Chambliss Facebook Page9
Jean Ann Esselink10 is a straight friend to the gay community .
Proud and loud Liberal . Closet writer of political fiction . Black sheep agnostic Democrat from a conservative Catholic family .
Living in Northern Oakland County Michigan with Puck the Wonder Beagle.
Follow me on Twitter as @Uncucumbered11 or friend me on Facebook12.
Tagged as: Eric Erickson, Fort Bragg, General Jeffrey Sinclair, General Sinclair, Max Cleland, Rape, Red State, Robert Baled, Saxby Chabless, senate armed services committee, sexual assault1314151617181920212223
Friends:
We invite you to sign up for our new mailing list, and subscribe to The New Civil Rights Movement via email or RSS242526.
Also, please like us on Facebook27, and follow us on Twitter28!
References
- ^ Senator Saxby Chambliss (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ tried to rehabilitate (www.redstate.com)
- ^ Eric Erickson (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Brigadier General Jeffrey Sinclair is accused of adultery (fayobserver.com)
- ^ Uniform Code of Military Justice (www.au.af.mil)
- ^ other trial (fortbragg.patch.com)
- ^ dirt-bomb politics (www.washingtonpost.com)
- ^ Max Cleland (en.wikipedia.org)
- ^ Facebook Page (www.facebook.com)
- ^ Jean Ann Esselink (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ @Uncucumbered (twitter.com)
- ^ Facebook (www.facebook.com)
- ^ Eric Erickson (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Fort Bragg (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ General Jeffrey Sinclair (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ General Sinclair (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Max Cleland (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Rape (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Red State (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Robert Baled (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ Saxby Chabless (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ senate armed services committee (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ sexual assault (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com)
- ^ sign up for our new mailing list (visitor.r20.constantcontact.com)
- ^ subscribe to The New Civil Rights Movement via email (feedburner.google.com)
- ^ RSS (feeds2.feedburner.com)
- ^ like us on Facebook (www.facebook.com)
- ^ follow us on Twitter (twitter.com)
House committee passes bill to address military sexual assaults …
WASHINGTON With broad support from Republicans and Democrats, a House committee Wednesday approved legislation to tackle the growing problem of sexual assault in the armed forces by taking away the power of military commanders to overturn convictions in rape and assault cases. The bill passed by the House Armed Services Committee also requires that anyone found guilty of a sex-related crime receive a punishment that includes, at a minimum, a dismissal from military service or a dishonorable discharge. The word should go out clearly and strongly that if you commit a sexual assault in the military, you are out, said Rep .
Michael Turner, R-Ohio . Turner and Rep . Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., wrote many of the provisions in the House bill.
By stripping commanders of their longstanding authority to reverse or change court-martial convictions, lawmakers are aiming to shake up the military s culture and give victims the confidence that if they report a crime their allegations won t be discounted and they won t face retaliation. Frustration has been building on Capitol Hill for weeks over the Defense Department s failure to staunch sexual assaults in the ranks. The Pentagon estimated in a recent report that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year, up from an estimated 19,000 assaults in 2011, based on an anonymous survey of military personnel .
While the number of sexual assaults that members of the military actually reported rose 6 percent to 3,374 in 2012, thousands of victims were still unwilling to come forward despite new oversight and assistance programs aimed at curbing the crimes, the report said. The military has obviously been unable to solve this problem independently, Tsongas said. The legislation is part of a sweeping defense policy bill that the Republican-led Armed Services Committee pulled together during a daylong session .
The $638 billion measure for the fiscal year beginning Oct .
1 included $86 billion for the war in Afghanistan as well as contentious provisions on the U.S . detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and nuclear weapons. The full House is expected to vote on the bill next week.
Despite the congressional clamor to cut the deficit, the committee bill rejects several Pentagon attempts to save money . It spares a version of the Global Hawk unmanned aircraft, rebuffs attempts to increase health care fees for retirees and their dependents, and opposes another round of domestic base closures. In fact, the panel didn t just say no to more base closings, it went as far as including a provision barring the Pentagon from even planning for another round.
That drew ridicule from Smith, who offered an amendment essentially eliminating the prohibition on the Pentagon thinking ahead . Smith said it made no sense to tie the Pentagon s hands as it faces smaller budgets. I don t think this committee has the luxury of being so darn parochial anymore, to say every single time any one of the (military) services comes into our state and says, Look, we ve got to rearrange, that we re going to fight tooth-and-nail to stop them, Smith said.
But Smith s amendment was soundly rejected, 44-18 . Several Republicans argued that they didn t want the Pentagon wasting time planning for an effort that Congress would never accept. The committee approved an amendment to provide $140 million as a down payment to install ground-based interceptors at a new missile defense site on the East Coast to expand the country s defenses from a potential ballistic missile attack by Iran .
The measure would require the site at a yet-to-be-determined location to be ready by 2018. Overall, the bill fails to acknowledge the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts that Washington has grudgingly accepted . The cuts of $41 billion hit the Pentagon on March 1 and forced the military to furlough workers and scale back training.
The Pentagon faces deeper reductions in projected spending of close to $1 trillion over a decade, but the bill did not reflect that reality for next fiscal year . The Pentagon likely will have to cut $54 billion to meet the numbers dictated by the so-called sequester. The committee s action on sexual assaults came one day after a high-profile Senate hearing during which senators grilled military leaders about the scourge in their ranks .
The leaders conceded that they have been less than diligent in dealing with the problem, but pushed back against far-reaching legislation to give the authority to level charges to a military prosecutor rather than the victim s commander. Military leaders are more receptive to the House provisions, would strip commanders of the discretion to reverse a court-martial ruling, except in cases involving minor offenses . Commanders also would be barred from reducing a guilty finding by a court-martial to guilty of a lesser offense.
The measure also would require that anyone found guilty of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy or an attempt to commit any of those offenses receive a punishment that includes a dismissal from military service or a dishonorable discharge. The legislation eliminates the five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for sexual assault and sexual assault of a child . It also establishes the authority for military legal counsel to provide legal assistance to victims of sex-related offenses and requires enhanced training for all military and civilian attorneys involved in sex-related cases.
Rep . Jackie Speier, D-Calif., applauded the committee s action . But she said she would continue to push for even broader changes to better protect victims.
Speier has introduced separate legislation that would take the reporting and investigation of sexual assaults out of the military s normal chain of command . The bill would create an autonomous Sexual Assault Oversight and Response Office comprised of civilian and military experts . Speier said she will offer her bill as an amendment on the House floor.
Unless we increase the number of prosecutions and the number of convictions, they we have not achieved the goal, she said .
We have not sanitized the military of sexual predators.
Senators blast military response to sex assaults – The Oakland Press
By RICHARD LARDNER and DONNA CASSATA
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) U.S . senators dressed down senior military leaders Tuesday, led by female lawmakers, combat veterans and former prosecutors who insisted that sexual assault in the ranks has cost the services the trust and respect of the American people as well as the nation s men and women in uniform. Summoned to Capitol Hill, Army Gen .
Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the beribboned four-star chiefs of the service branches conceded in an extraordinary hearing that they had faltered in dealing with sexual assault . One said assaults were like a cancer in the military. But they strongly opposed congressional efforts to strip commanders of their traditional authority to decide whether to level charges in their units.
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, especially the panel s seven female senators, grilled the chiefs about whether the military s mostly male leadership understands differences between relatively minor sexual offenses and serious crimes that deserve swift and decisive justice. Not every single commander necessarily wants women in the force . Not every single commander believes what a sexual assault is .
Not every single commander can distinguish between a slap on the ass and a rape because they merge all of these crimes together, said Sen . Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. Frustration among the senators seemed to boil over as they discussed recent high-profile cases and statistics on sexual assault that underscored the challenges the Defense Department and Congress face.
Sen . John McCain, R-Ariz., a Navy veteran of Vietnam, said a woman came to him the previous night and said her daughter wanted to join the military . She asked McCain if he could give his unqualified support to her.
I could not, McCain said . I cannot overstate my disgust and disappointment over the continued reports of sexual misconduct in our military . We ve been talking about the issue for years, and talk is insufficient.
The committee is considering seven legislative proposals, including one introduced by Gillibrand that would deny commanders the authority to decide when criminal charges are filed and remove the ability of senior officers to convene courts-martial. More than 40 senators are sponsors or co-sponsors of the proposals, several of which have overlapping provisions . A bill by Sens .
Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., would provide any victims with a special military lawyer who would assist them throughout the process . Another, sponsored by Sens . Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, would require any service member found guilty of rape or sexual assault receive a minimum punishment of a dismissal or a dishonorable discharge .
Sen . Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., introduced a bill with provisions that require commanders to submit reports of sex-related offenses to more senior officers within 24 hours. Continued…1
Dempsey and the service chiefs warned against making the dramatic changes called for in Gillibrand s legislation . Removing commanders from the military justice process, Dempsey said, would undercut their ability to preserve good order and discipline in their units.
We cannot simply legislate our way out of this problem, said Gen . Ray Odierno, the Army s chief of staff . Without equivocation, I believe maintaining the central role of commander in our military justice system is absolutely critical to any solution.
But Gillibrand defended her proposal, which has garnered 18 co-sponsors in two weeks . She said victims of sexual assault are reluctant to report the crimes to their commanders because they fear their allegations will be dismissed and they might face retaliation . Aggressive reforms in the military s legal code are needed to force cultural changes, she said.
You have lost the trust of the men and women who rely on you, Gillibrand said . They re afraid to report . They think their careers will be over .
They fear retaliation . They fear being blamed . That is our biggest challenge right there.
Dempsey and the service chiefs told the committee they back Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel s April recommendation to change the Uniform Code of Military Justice and largely strip commanding officers of the power to toss out a military verdict . That change is included in several of the Senate proposals including Gillibrand s and is likely to be adopted by the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday in its version of the annual defense policy bill. But Gillibrand and several other senators said that wasn t nearly enough.
Several members of the committee noted that American allies including Great Britain, Israel and Australia have already have taken serious cases outside the chain of command . The U.S . military leaders said they had just begun to study the changes to see how they might apply to this country.
The committee s Democratic chairman, Sen . Carl Levin of Michigan, opened the hearing by saying the problem of sexual assault is of such a scope and magnitude that it has become a stain on our military . Levin has not endorsed any of the bills.
The military leaders didn t dispute Levin s assessment. Sexual assault and harassment are like a cancer within the force, a cancer that left untreated will destroy the fabric of our force, Odierno said . It s imperative that we take a comprehensive approach to prevent attacks, to protect our people, and where appropriate, to prosecute wrongdoing and hold people accountable. Continued…2
While acknowledging the problem and accepting that legislation is inevitable, the military leaders insisted that commanders keep their authority to handle serious offenses including sexual assault cases that occur in their units.
The Air Force s top officer, Gen . Mark Welsh, said, Commanders having the authority to hold airmen criminally accountable for misconduct .. . is crucial to building combat-ready, disciplined units.
But, their voices rising, female members of the committee complained that the military s reporting process fails to recognize the seriousness of rape. This isn t about sex, said McCaskill, a former county prosecutor in Missouri . This is about assaultive domination and violence .
And as long as those two get mushed together, you all are not going to be as successful as you need to be at getting after the most insidious part of this, which is the predators in your ranks that are sullying the great name of our American military. The Pentagon estimated in a recent report that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year, up from an estimated 19,000 assaults in 2011, based on an anonymous survey of military personnel . While the number of sexual assaults that members of the military actually reported rose 6 percent to 3,374 in 2012, thousands of victims were still unwilling to come forward despite new oversight and assistance programs aimed at curbing the crimes, the report said.
Sen . Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., suggested that youth is partly to blame for the problem . The young folks that are coming into each of your services are anywhere from 17 to 22 or 23, he said .
The hormone level created by nature sets in place the possibility for these types of things to occur . But Chambliss also said the military and Congress need to do far more to stop sexual assaults from occurring. Commanders and senior enlisted troops are ultimately responsible for ensuring that their units don t develop climates conducive to sexual assaults and harassment .
But Dempsey said that he and other military leaders haven t kept their fingers on the pulse of their units as closely as they should over the past decade due to the heavy pace of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. I think I took my eye off the ball a bit in the commands that I had, said Dempsey, who spent more than three years as a commander in Iraq. Dempsey also said in response to a question from McCain that there are gaps in the way the services screen prospective recruits that could allow an individual with a history of sex-related crimes to join.
There are currently, in my judgment, inadequate protections for precluding that from happening, Dempsey told McCain . So a sex offender could, in fact, find their way into the armed forces of the United States. Continued…3
The committee s hearing, which lasted nearly eight hours with testimony from three different panels of witnesses, came as a string of incidents has raised doubts about how aggressively the services are acting to change their cultures and eradicate sexual assaults. Last week, the Pentagon said the U.S .
Naval Academy is investigating allegations that three football team members sexually assaulted a female midshipman at an off-campus house more than a year ago . A lawyer for the woman says she was ostracized on campus after she reported it. In recent weeks, a soldier at the U.S .
Military Academy was charged with secretly photographing women, including in a bathroom .
The Air Force officer who led the service s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response unit was arrested on charges of groping a woman .
And the manager of the Army s sexual assault response program at Fort Campbell, Ky., was relieved of his post after his arrest in a domestic dispute with his ex-wife.
References
- ^ Continued… (www.theoaklandpress.com)
- ^ Continued… (www.theoaklandpress.com)
- ^ Continued… (www.theoaklandpress.com)
Also on POLITICO: Hagel to cadets: Fight sexual assault